Correct post-bias degeneration attribution

Cannot isolate instruct tuning vs architecture (sliding window,
KV sharing, logit softcapping) with current test matrix.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.6 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
This commit is contained in:
2026-04-06 19:44:42 +07:00
parent 0448e96bc9
commit eeada7810a
5 changed files with 15 additions and 9 deletions

View File

@@ -12,8 +12,8 @@
\newlabel{sec:results}{{3}{2}{Experiments}{section.3}{}}
\@writefile{toc}{\contentsline {subsection}{\numberline {3.1}Setup}{2}{subsection.3.1}\protected@file@percent }
\@writefile{toc}{\contentsline {subsection}{\numberline {3.2}One-Shot Conditioning}{3}{subsection.3.2}\protected@file@percent }
\@writefile{lot}{\contentsline {table}{\numberline {1}{\ignorespaces Post-bias degeneration is caused by instruct tuning, not model size.}}{3}{table.1}\protected@file@percent }
\newlabel{tab:postbias}{{1}{3}{Post-bias degeneration is caused by instruct tuning, not model size}{table.1}{}}
\@writefile{lot}{\contentsline {table}{\numberline {1}{\ignorespaces Post-bias degeneration correlates with both instruct tuning and architectural complexity (sliding window attention, KV sharing, logit softcapping). Confounded in current test matrix.}}{3}{table.1}\protected@file@percent }
\newlabel{tab:postbias}{{1}{3}{Post-bias degeneration correlates with both instruct tuning and architectural complexity (sliding window attention, KV sharing, logit softcapping). Confounded in current test matrix}{table.1}{}}
\@writefile{toc}{\contentsline {subsection}{\numberline {3.3}Stimulus Generalization and Misfire}{3}{subsection.3.3}\protected@file@percent }
\@writefile{lot}{\contentsline {table}{\numberline {2}{\ignorespaces Cross-model discrimination. Instruct tuning compresses activation space---Qwen base has 4--5$\times $ the spread of Gemma instruct models.}}{3}{table.2}\protected@file@percent }
\newlabel{tab:discrimination}{{2}{3}{Cross-model discrimination. Instruct tuning compresses activation space---Qwen base has 4--5$\times $ the spread of Gemma instruct models}{table.2}{}}
@@ -27,11 +27,11 @@
\citation{meng2022rome,meng2023memit}
\bibstyle{plainnat}
\bibcite{das2024larimar}{{1}{2024}{{Das et~al.}}{{}}}
\bibcite{fountas2024emllm}{{2}{2024}{{Fountas et~al.}}{{}}}
\@writefile{toc}{\contentsline {section}{\numberline {4}Privacy by Representation}{4}{section.4}\protected@file@percent }
\@writefile{toc}{\contentsline {section}{\numberline {5}Related Work}{4}{section.5}\protected@file@percent }
\@writefile{toc}{\contentsline {section}{\numberline {6}Limitations}{4}{section.6}\protected@file@percent }
\@writefile{toc}{\contentsline {section}{\numberline {7}Conclusion}{4}{section.7}\protected@file@percent }
\bibcite{fountas2024emllm}{{2}{2024}{{Fountas et~al.}}{{}}}
\bibcite{jang2024camelot}{{3}{2024}{{Jang et~al.}}{{}}}
\bibcite{lewis2020rag}{{4}{2020}{{Lewis et~al.}}{{}}}
\bibcite{meng2022rome}{{5}{2022}{{Meng et~al.}}{{}}}